FILMATIQUE: An aesthetic of minimalism governs your narrative universe, from the limited dialogue to the elegantly simple mise-en-scène, fluid camerawork and immersive soundscape. What were your references or influences in assembling your aesthetic approach for Dust and Ashes?
PHK: Koreans are ashamed to receive too much praise. Like now. Thank you, though. All the technical parts, such as mise-en-scènes, camerawork, and soundscapes, had to be done realistically and intuitively. So I filmed in the redevelopment area of Seoul where construction was underway, and decided the camera should not stop until the scene was over. The sound was rough and rugged, but I tried to stick to the space. The aesthetic approach of the film Dust and Ashes was influenced by other films—it seems to be a frank expression that they tried to imitate the films. These films are 4 Months 3 Weeks & 2 Days and Rosetta.
FLMTQ: Like your short film Neighbors, Dust and Ashes examines the underbelly of contemporary South Korean society and attendant topics of wealth disparity and mental health issues. To what extent did you set out to make a political film with Dust and Ashes?
PHK: In 2011, suicide was a social issue in Korean society, and in 2018, gender discrimination and social welfare blind spots became a big problem. It wasn't intentional, but I was interested in social issues. I didn't want to send political messages, but to deliver emotional empathy, even if it seemed radical. And I think that the film's limited budget has had a lot of impact.